Follow Us

Get Daily Updates

Tyson Huber

 ipadlarge

I want to preface this post with that I am by no means an Apple hater. I own an iPhone that I am constantly glued to, and up until recently I owned a Macbook that I loved dearly.

That said however, I think Apple may have a flop on their hands at first glance with the iPad. Here are my thoughts:

First, let’s start off with the facts. Here are the iPad specs:

  • .5 inches thin
  • 1.5 lbs
  • 9.7 inch IPS display
  • Capacitive multitouch
  • 1GHz proc Apple A4 chip (PA Semi!)
  • 16GB, 32GB, 64GB
  • 802.11n WiFi
  • BT 2.1
  • Compass
  • 10 hrs battery life
  • 1 month standby

At first glance, I can see the appeal. It’s bigger than an iPhone/iPod, has a pretty screen, and is relatively portable – but dig under the surface and you have a product that doesn’t really seem to have a realistic demographic.

Let’s start with current Apple customers with iPod Touches and iPhones. What’s the use of buying this product? My iPhone can do everything the iPad can, it’s more portable, has a camera, and along with my monthly AT&T service I can make calls and send texts. iPod Touch users, you can do all the same things the iPad can as well. This iPad is essentially a giant iPod Touch with optional 3G service – that will further slow down AT&T’s already struggling network.

It’s my understanding that this is meant to compete with all of those netbooks out there. Again, Apple missed the mark. Sure, you can surf the web, but beyond that what else are you going to do with it? I know, I hear you Kindle and Nook fans out there, you can read books and stuff on it – but a Nook is in color and far less costly. You can also store photos and music on there – again, I can do that on my iPhone that fits in my pocket. Finally, a lot of netbook users out there want their netbooks for two main reasons – web and basic office functions. iWorks? I’m sorry, you want to compete out there you need Microsoft Office. Most of the white collar industry out there still functions on PC’s and Microsoft Office programs – the traveling business community out there is not going to risk compatibility issues while they are on the road between Microsoft Word and iWorks Pages. And even if you were okay with that risk, how are you going to type it? A touch screen keyboard works well on a small device, anything bigger than that you need a physical keyboard to do any meaningful work that requires typing (And yes, I know, there is a keyboard dock for it- I’m about to get to that). Not to mention no multitasking like the iPhone/iPod Touch – meaning you can’t have Pages and Safari open simultaneously.

Perhaps the biggest problem for Apple – which is a common one – is pricing. I know you get what you pay for, but let’s break this down. You can get a relatively top of the line (by netbook standards) HP netbook for about $35o. Seems reasonable for a stripped down laptop that is meant to be used mostly for web and basic office uses – all packaged together in a nice smaller package. Well, here’s Apple’s pricing on the iPad:

 appleipadpricing

I own a 16GB iPhone, with all of my Apps, music, videos, and photos, it’s nearly to capacity. To me, a 16GB iPad-meant-to-be-a-laptop-thing isn’t reasonable; you start adding other files, more videos (because “…the iPad is awesome for TV shows and Movies!”) you are going to burn through that 16 GB pretty damn fast. So let’s say you go for the 32GB (again, they make iPhones with this capacity) and you can live without the 3G -which would cost you an additional $30/month from AT&T – so you are at $600+. Okay, well that’s “only” $250 more than that HP netbook; but then you buy the iPad and decide to reasonably use it at home or to type anything significant, you need that keyboard dock, and you better believe for a touchscreen device like this you are going to want that case. Let’s say this all costs another -and I’m being generous here I think- $100; BAM! You’re more than double the price a netbook that would more than likely meet all your needs.

So who is this iPad meant for? There’s not enough there for a traveling business-type to feasably use it, it’s too expensive for someone who wants to buy something like this to just surf the web, and I don’t see any reason a college student could use one (and I know, I am one). There are little components to each of these demographics, but nothing substantial it seems to justify the costly price tag (a price tag that Apple laughably advertises on their site right now as an “unbelieveable price”); you get up to that 64GB+3G range and you may as well just drop the extra 200 bones to get a more reasonable and useful Macbook.

The iPad is a device that you can use to:

  • Surf the web without Flash plugin
  • Create “office” documents without a physical keyboard (stock) and risking compatibility issues with the more widely used Microsoft Office
  • Store photos and videos
  • Store music
  • Download and read books
  • Utilize the many App Store apps on a larger screen than your iPhone/iPod Touch
  • Look up maps and directions – because using this thing in a car would be safe…

Does that sound like it’s worth the $500+ price tag?

I think the Kindle and the Nook are both great ideas and products – they are also ideas that are aimed at a specific market. The iPad feels too much like a shotgun blast at several different markets with little substance to back it up. There isn’t enough included to compete in the netbook market and it costs too much to compete in the e-reader market, so where does it fit? Had apple maybe just comeout with an e-reader like a Nook or Kindle that maybe did a little more to give it an edge but still keep the price tag under $400 Apple might have a product that makes sense.

I assure you, I’m not a tech snob, and the iPad looks… neat and will probably in some way revolutionize computers down the road and it’s impressive that we even live in a world where a product like this exists, but Apple missed a mark. I love my iPhone. I use it all the time: It’s my iPod when I’m at the gym, it’s my social network outlet while I’m at work, it’s my internet on the go, it’s my handheld gaming device when I’m bored, and it even had a Kindle application for books, and most importantly it fits in my pocket and only cost me $300. Ultimately, I think Apple fanboys are going to rush out and buy the iPad, but without a clear market to corner and a hefty pricetag, I think Apple may have a flop on their hands.

Responses to “Apple Unleashes ‘iPad’ Onto the World”

Bryan Young
Swank-mo-tron
on January 27th, 2010 at 3:31 pm said:

I’m really shocked there’s no stylus or multimedia support.

Apples are reknowned for their kindness to multimedia professionals and I don’t see how they’re catering to that audience with this.

How could an artist use this?

Dylan
Dylan
on January 27th, 2010 at 3:41 pm said:

I would very much agree. When I first heard I thought, ‘”hey, It looks pretty cool” but without a flash plugin or other new features different from my ipod touch there is no point in me buying one.

Jason Young
Dr. Cyborg Robot M.D. attorney at law - Five
on January 27th, 2010 at 3:45 pm said:

I’m excited to get more details, personally.

Clang! Boom! Steam!
Clang! Boom! Steam!
on January 27th, 2010 at 4:04 pm said:

I was really hoping for something more akin to a tablet PC.
I don’t see how the average person could justify purchasing one of these in a million years much less anyone who already owns an iPhone or iPod Touch.
Pretty underwhelming.

Jason
Jason
on January 27th, 2010 at 4:11 pm said:

uh… let’s set a couple things straight here son.

The Ipad does a bit more than the iPhone and iPod touch, albeit not much. Later in your post you admit this.

You say the Nook is color. It’s not. It has a Mini-screen for browsing books that’s in color, but what you’ll spend most of your time looking at is a grey scale e-ink screen. Perhaps you could point out reading books on the iPad will be more likely to strain your eyes instead. (This is why the Kindle and Nook opt for e-ink.)

iWorks is actually pretty compatible with Microsoft Office. I exchange files with Office users all the time… at work.

With that said, yes. The iPad is a flop… but mostly because it’s a tablet. People don’t really want tablets. If they did the tablets we’ve had for more than a decade would have caught on by now.

Bryan Young
Swank-mo-tron
on January 27th, 2010 at 4:29 pm said:

The price will drop, they’ll come out with a fancier model, and it’ll be more like a tablet.

That’s when I’ll consider it.

Chris
Chris
on January 29th, 2010 at 12:13 am said:

It doesn’t have a stylus because Steve Jobs has said he doesn’t like them and wanted a device that didn’t use them.

I think we should all wait before any of us call it a flop…

I think it may do just fine. I am hearing a lot of excited people wanting it. I myself went from “meh” to “man, I may just want one”.

I also think its not really fair to make much of a judgement until actually holding and using one. I hear that’s the real difference maker.

Swank, I really doubt the price will go down much. They nailed a pretty killer price with what it has to offer and the technology used and created for it.

Chris
Chris
on January 29th, 2010 at 12:16 am said:

Also, Swank, I don’t believe this is made FOR artists, but rather, Apple considers it to be like art. I tend to agree… It is a pretty sexy device.

The target audience are the people needing something between an iPhone and a MacBook or MacBook Pro. Its not for everyone…

I keep thinking, “Man if I was a student, this would be pretty killer”. Downloadable books all in one place, WAY less weight then all the books, searching books, quiet typing in class, not taking. Pretty epic I think.

I also think it’ll make a good “extra” computer….if you have the money.

zombietron
zombietron
on January 29th, 2010 at 7:42 am said:

No the I-pad isn’t a flop because people don’t want tablets. The I-pad is a flop because Apple gave it garbage internals. 1 ghz processor….. no independent video…… I spend my time with a ton of mac fanboys who were drooling at the early drawings. And laughing at the announcement. Apple fail

Chris
Chris
on January 29th, 2010 at 11:32 am said:

You can’t call it a flop until it does so. You’ll have to wait 6 months to year to make that call.

The thing is, its not meant to be a computing powerhouse. It does exactly has it was designed to do, and from what I’ve seen, it does those things well enough.

Tyson Huber
Arse-bot
on January 29th, 2010 at 12:12 pm said:

There is a glaring problem with the iPad, and it’s reminiscent of the same problem that is on the iPhone and iPod touch.

I’ve heard people say “Oh, I would buy that as a convenient internet surfing device.” but it doesn’t support Flash. Period. And Flash is still everywhere on the web, if you are surfing from an iPad you will see a lovely blue brick, just like on the iPhone.

This is straight from Adobe:
“It looks like Apple is continuing to impose restrictions on their devices that limit both content publishers and consumers. Unlike many other ebook readers using the ePub file format, consumers will not be able to access ePub content with Apple’s DRM technology on devices made by other manufacturers. And without Flash support, iPad users will not be able to access the full range of web content, including over 70% of games and 75% of video on the web.”

Chris
Chris
on January 29th, 2010 at 2:09 pm said:

I agree with you on the Flash thing. If its like the iPhone though, Apple is not restricting it, Adobe is…in a way.

Flash is super processor intensive. Adobe hasn’t really found a way to make it work well with iPhone type processors, they just aren’t powerful enough. Maybe they can make it work with the A4 processor in the ITab.

Chris
Chris
on January 29th, 2010 at 3:04 pm said:

Taken from macrumors.com:

“Finally, several readers have noticed that in many shots the URL shown in Safari on the iPad in Apple’s promotional materials is actually an apple.com gallery page rather than the real New York Times page it appears to be at first glance.

Consequently, it appears that the presence of Flash support in Apple’s iPad promotional materials is either the result of video editing tricks or a specially-configured Flash-compatible iPad used for the video and image shoots.

Update: MacRumors has heard from a source that The New York Times itself generated high-resolution images of several of its pages, including Flash and ad content, in order to improve the look of the pages for Apple’s use in iPad marketing materials.”

This is disappointing that Apple would do these things. Bummer.

Every Man
Every Man
on January 29th, 2010 at 3:21 pm said:

UR ALL FUKIN FAGS!

Every Woman
Every Woman
on January 29th, 2010 at 3:21 pm said:

ONLY FAGS FUK OTHR FAGS!

Leave a Reply