Follow Us

Get Daily Updates

Lucas Ackley

Spider-Man Mystique

There are a lot of reasons Spider-Man 3 didn’t work as well as it could have. Or rather, should have. I’m going to share with you three steps that could have saved the movie:

Step One: Eliminate Venom from the script.
Seriously. I know a lot of people wanted to see him on the big screen, hell, I thought it was exciting. The problem is that Venom’s back story is pretty hefty. I’d say almost as much as Harry’s, if not more. They could have kept the symbiote and Eddie in 3, but left out Venom. Maybe have a cliff hanger ending. The clock tower scene would have made a great ending. Especially if they had filmed 3 and 4 together (like originally planned) and had 4 come out that fall.

Step Two: Write Mysterio into the script.
Some would say Spider-Man 3’s biggest downfall was too many villains. I don’t think this was the case at all. If any superhero deals with 10 different bad guys while trying to bring home Aunt May’s dinner before it gets cold, it’s Spider-Man. He has a plethora of great B rated villains: Shocker, Vulture, Mysterio… They could be 20 minute bit parts trying to stop Peter while he’s going from point A to B.

Why Mysterio, you might ask?

Step 3: Cast Bruce Campbell as Mysterio.
For those of you who don’t know who Bruce Campbell is, shame on you. He’s the greatest B movie actor on the planet. He’s had small parts in Spider-Man 1 and 2, so giving him a bigger part in 3 would be awesome. Mysterio is a special effects expert turned to the dark side. His costume is ridiculous, and so are most of his capers. What better villain/actor for comic relief just after Harry breaks up Pete and MJ?

I’m sure a lot of people would have their own ideas for the perfect Spider-Man 3. Although, I don’t think many of them could argue that mine would have been better than what we got.

Tomorrow: Swank-mo-tron gives his opinion on how Spider-man 3 could have been fixed.

Response to “How I could have saved Spider-Man 3”

Jeff Ortiz
Humanjunk
on February 29th, 2008 at 11:59 pm said:

My takes on how they could have improved Spider-Man 3…

The “Venom” plot:
Follow the Ultimate Spider-Man cannon for the symbiote, have the life form be a genetic construct rather than something from outer space. This would have followed the same concept from the first flick, a genetically altered spider rather than a radioactive spider. That being said, cut out Sandman. I like the villain, but 3 is too many when you’ve built up the New Goblin.

The “No-Venom” plot:
Cut out Venom, leave it at Sandman and New Goblin. Fuck the subplot of Flint Marco as a poor guy with good heart stuck doing bad things. Make him a bad ass mother fucker out who fell backwards into some powers who uses them to rob banks. And fuck the subplot of him being the “true” killer of Uncle Ben. Leave the Goblin plot the same.

The “No-Venom or Sandman” plot:
Leave the Goblin plot. They built up to it at the end of the 2nd flick. Bring in the Lizard. They had already introduced Doc Conners, I’d find it incredibly entertaining to have a bunch of insane mutilations around NYC, and, good ol’ J. Jonah Jameson is blaming them on Spider-Man. And with Harry Osborn now huffing endless amounts of Goblin Gas, blaming Peter for the death of his father, he helps set up Spidey as the perpetrator. Spidey has to clear his name.

Leave a Reply