Follow Us

Get Daily Updates

Bryan Young

I’ve been reading Robert Kirkman’s Invincible since it’s release in 2003 and have every month since then looked forward with excitement to each new installment. It’s a well written with characters that I’ve become quite invested in and attached to over the years. It’s taken quite a few twists and turns and I’ve enjoyed them immensely.

Lately, the urge to read the book has flagged a little.

The story seemed to flounder for a few issues, coinciding with the time Kirkman came on board as a partner at Image. You can hardly blame him for getting more busy and not seeming to have an outline. Sure, Ryan Ottley’s art has started off as breathtaking and has actually gotten better as each issue progressed. After almost 60 issues, Ryan’s art has never been better. And the new colorist, FCO Plascencia has offered a new depth, range, and emotion to Ryan’s art that I didn’t realize was missing.

But as soon as I read issue #63, I felt like Kirkman has once again his stride with the writing, easing back into the saddle after what must have been a hectic last year or so.

As for this current story arc, an aged Viltrumite warrior has come to Earth and is told to secure it at any cost. Invincible and Kid Omni-Man (Mark Grayson and his little brother Oliver) have done their best to hold him off, but there are less than half a dozen super-heroes on Earth that could stand toe-to-toe with a full-strength Viltrumite for even a minute and most of them are still nursing wounds from the invasion of Evil Invincibles orchestrated by the long-thought-dead Angstrom Levy.

I’m having trouble describing this issue, because I really, really don’t want to spoil it.

But something happens that literally choked the breath out of my lungs. And then I wept.

Like a baby.

For a full few minutes after I finished reading, I was still tearing up. When asked what was wrong, I was simply only able to open the book, point to the offending panels and tear up some more.

If you’ve been reading this book all along, this issue has a punch that I didn’t realize Kirkman was capable of delivering so wholly unexpectedly. If you haven’t been reading this book, I would suggest starting at the beginning (right here) and catching up as quickly as possible.

If you’re one of those people that ditched the book for whatever reason, now is the time to come back. You were wrong to go, even with the tightening of the belts this economy and the ever-expanding cost of comics has cost.

And for those of you hurt by the events of this issue, don’t go. Don’t you want to know how things turn out?

Responses to “REVIEW: Invincible #63”

JobFaust
JobFaust
on June 21st, 2009 at 10:32 am said:

When is the new Trade Paperback compilation supposed to come out? I feel like it has been more than a year since I bought Invincible and now I am so far behind I am scared to jump over to the individual issues.

Jeff Ortiz
Humanjunk
on July 4th, 2009 at 4:37 am said:

I just got around to reading this current issue. I’m dropping the book after the next issue. The climax totally sapped my desire to continue reading. I’m not one for gushing sentiment and am all for someone telling a story without compromising their vision but the Invincible War arc and this current were damn near impossible for me to follow (and I consider myself a savvy reader) even after going back and reading those stories a few times to try and get a feel for what the fuck is going on.

Don’t get me wrong, issue 63 has a near flawless script (I agree with you that it’s the best in a long time) and Ottley’s art is always breathtaking, but quite simply, I’m not digging the direction of this book and haven’t for a while now.

That and the ending felt like Kirkman was waxing Stan Lee’s Amazing Spider-Man #121.

Bryan Young
Swank-mo-tron
on July 6th, 2009 at 11:05 am said:

The thing about a writer is that it’s their job to give the audience what they NEED, not what they WANT. Kirkman is putting Mark through the paces. It’s a good thing.

If you enjoy the character (which it sounds like you do) you’d stay on board to see those paces, whether you like them or not.

Leave a Reply