Previous Post
Next Post
Follow Us
Get Daily Updates
After playing this I really only had one or two comments… Tekken 6 is still Tekken. SO if you’re a Tekken fan this game is phenomenal, the visuals look better than 5 of course, beautiful environments, great character models, smooth animations, and the technical fighting is still there. The only visual complaint I had was mild clipping during some of the replays and when the snow or other environment pieces were moving or cracking, it didn’t look quite, real, almost like the cleavage lines were directly on a polygon, and not well rounded.
Above: So Many Characters!!!
If you’d rather throw a fireball, then you’ll hate it just the same. The audio is well put together as with any fighter, solid collision noises, good pump-u-up style techno and rock music, and once again the characters look phenomenal. I can’t stress that enough because well damn they look so good! With 40 fighters, huge environments and once again this is a huge technical fighter, this game is what it promises. Tekken fans will not be disappointed, and I’m sure a new wave of gamers can jump into this, but once again, if Tekken was never your bag, it hasn’t changed much to make it yours.
Score
- Graphics – 8.5(mild environment problems)
- audio – 8
- Replay- 9
- Controls – 9.5
-
overall – 8.5
Click Image Below to Purchase on Amazon
Responses to “Game Review: Tekken 6”
on October 26th, 2009 at 11:29 am said:
This is a pretty superficial review, and tells us absolutely nothing about this game.
on October 26th, 2009 at 11:40 am said:
It’s TEKKEN. What else do you need to know?
on October 26th, 2009 at 11:55 am said:
-How is the single player campaign?
-Are all characters available immediately?
-What is Motion Blur and is it any good?
-Are there any broken mechanics?
-Are there unlockables?
-How is online multiplayer?
-How is it on a control pad vs true joystick?
-How is it on an HDTV vs regular TV?
-What extra features are there, and are they good or bad?
-What really stands out as good?
-What is really troubling?
That’s a good start. As such, this article feels more like a clever advertisement rather than an actual review.
“It’s Tekken” is a statement of fact, not a review.
on October 26th, 2009 at 12:28 pm said:
-How is the single player campaign? – garbage, well about as good as the tekken 5 one….
-Are all characters available immediately? – With 40 fighters see pic above for confusion. (the big one with the characters on it) that’s the opening character select screen.
-Motion blur is a graphical enhancer that makes the movement make more realistic, and simulate movement on a frame- same as pixar,
unlockables –
control pad vs joystick – joystick is always better..when you hit the arcade do you pick up a controller or grab a stick?
-looks better on HDTV… really? you asked that? hmmm better res, designed in HD, I bet a tube looks great……
stands out as good? Its Tekken… like really man its Tekken? Its been the same basic game since ps1
what’s troubling.. Its TEKKEN,they’ve made the same game for 15 years— with a graphics boost.
He stated what he felt about the game, He didn’t title this (The Tekken Junkies Perfectly outlined review of every feature in the game) He simply stated it, Game Review Tekken: and wrote what he thought.
This clever advertisement brought to you by Juke-Bot
on October 26th, 2009 at 4:07 pm said:
The Le is correct. This review is not very good and comes off as an ad “Click Image Below to Purchase on Amazon!”
There is no mention of anything of substance. As it was written, it doesn’t even look like he played it.
on October 26th, 2009 at 4:55 pm said:
Guys, its a fighting game, what do you want? He talked about the graphics, the environments, the audio, the rest is the same as Tekken 5. And every single review we do has a link to purchase at Amazon.
on October 26th, 2009 at 9:12 pm said:
i agree with juke bot. what where you expecting lee?
your questions arent that smart.
on October 26th, 2009 at 9:15 pm said:
bottom line is if it aint broken dont fix it but polish it and add to it. other wise you get tekken 4 remember tekken four?! i still cry at night thinking about it…:(
on October 26th, 2009 at 11:16 pm said:
It’s sad the the images take up more space than the actual text. And it’s sad that Mike decided to make an uneducated attack against me without offering anything significant on his own.
And it’s even sadder that Juke-Box answered my questions by just making poor assumptions without any real proof.
I don’t think anyone here (even the author) has even played this game.
on October 26th, 2009 at 11:27 pm said:
Say what you like man, just because you didn’t like what I wrote doesn’t mean I’m lying to you. Thanks for reading .
on October 27th, 2009 at 9:20 am said:
“We publishers should be striving to set a good example to others and bring a certain amount of class to the industry; something which I have forgotten.” – The Le
Found here: http://www.enworld.org/forum/publishers-press-releases/239762-le-games-apology-gaming-community.html
Seems like you’ve forgotten to take your own advice, The Le. I wouldn’t file your comments under the category “classy”.
And as far as it being sad the images take up more space than the actual copy, it would appear you’ve forgotten to take your own advice again:
http://www.heroclixworld.com/HCW/Articles.aspx?ID=118&P=3
I know it’s a “sneak preview” for some HeroClix, but come on. Please try to regain some of that class you claimed to be searching for.
on October 27th, 2009 at 11:27 am said:
You know Le, after looking into this, I’m a little offended. Your links indicate that you’ve spent a large amount of time in forums, whether or not they were to hock your cheesy wares. And I mean cheesy in the most derogatory way you can take it. However if you’ve spent time in any type of web-based industry, you know the amount of skills one has to acquire to be here. Sadly they don’t teach people skills. If you come across a review I’ve written and would like more detail the good lord has blessed us with email, use it, ask me, I’ll answer the best I can. Or for fuck-sake use google, but if you find it worth your time to personally insult me and my work. You must not be doing much to better yourself or the world we live in.
on October 27th, 2009 at 2:29 pm said:
Kill-Tacular-Tron:
Thank you for your comments. The The Le Games stuff was from over a year ago. I made restitution, and my sales haven’t suffered one bit. I made my peace, and so did my customers. I fail to see why this has anything to do with this page and it’s article. That being said, I thank you for taking the time to google me – I am always surprised to find new fans like yourself. I also fail to see how you compare a PREVIEW PAGE with a REVIEW. The two are mutually exclusive. Nice try though. (no need to apologize to me, I forgive you)
Zombitron:
Your comment does you more harm than good. To claim that your poor review is acceptable simply because you don’t need to acquire any real writing skills (because it is a web-based industry) is perplexing at best. If you so flagrantly want to call this a “review” and post it on the internet for comments, then you should be willing to take criticism from it. I am utterly amazed that you justify your poor article simply because “they don’t teach people skills” to be a writer. But I do agree with you — web based articles like this proves that the bar is set very low.
Take a look at my initial post folks. I said this is a superficial review that tells us nothing about the game. It’s not derogatory, it’s not insulting, and it certainly isn’t calling anyone out or using profanity. Why are you all taking so much offense to it? Since you’re so fond of google, go search for “Tekken 6 Review”, read the results, and come back here to compare. This article is not a review. And based on it (and the responses), I have doubts that anyone here has played Tekken 6 before it was released today.
Again, thank you to all of you who decided to google me and look me up. I’m glad you dedicated your time and energy to find out more about me — I’m always pleased to have new fans.
-The Le
on October 27th, 2009 at 2:56 pm said:
Well once again bickering with you costs time, and unlike yours my time is worth more. You can believe what you wish but if what I say is a lie by that basis everything on the net is a lie. I’ve been involved in gaming for a long time, and have many connections. You have no reason to believe me and for that matter no reason to believe ign, gametrailers, metacritic, eurogamer, the list goes on. As far as us being fans, ill be sure to reference you as a bad business practice, and poor personality. But you use the word fan poorly, Hate as you will, at least our only poor choice is discussing this further with you
on October 27th, 2009 at 3:00 pm said:
“The Le”,
That forum post has plenty to do with this article. You are criticizing someone’s review and ethics behind it, while you yourself have been proven to have none.
Our reviews may sometimes run a little thin on occasion that we don’t feel the source material warrants an in depth review. But we are not liars or cheats. It’s persons like yourself that have caused the FTC to start creating laws and restrictions on blog reviewers.
I am sure you are proud that anyone can easily google your name and have the first thing come up show that you are a liar and a cheat.
Congratulations on your accomplishment.
Although you sarcastically forgave me for an apology that doesn’t exist, I don’t care. We have plenty of visitors that enjoy our content and come back for more every day. You are no longer welcome to be one of them.
You are a very arrogant dishonest person. Please do not waste anymore space with your comments.
on October 27th, 2009 at 3:27 pm said:
lmao guys. Chillax about it. If ya don’t like the review, find another. If ya don’t like a particular comment, ignore it.
Ignoring ignorance has saved a lot more of my time and kept me from being stressed out so much.
Just thought I’d pass on a bit of wisdom for you guys. Remember: it’s a game, and this is a forum. Calm down, relax, and don’t worry about petty things like what people say about your review or what people think of you.
on October 27th, 2009 at 3:33 pm said:
Good advice, Allen. Party on my friend.
on October 27th, 2009 at 3:53 pm said:
Good point Allen, we’ve been getting alot of shit lately, and usually we have fun with it. Honestly, arguing about pointless shit can be fun(see the guys on the WWE post) but this Le guy is a piece of shit, and we felt like he should know it.
on October 27th, 2009 at 11:09 pm said:
This review has to be one of the WORST ones I have ever read. And lets stop getting on The Le I see he has very valid points here.